Giving police the power to require a drone to be grounded,.The DT, in its 2018 consultation, Taking Flight: The Future of Drones in the UK, (Transport, 2019) announced its intention to give police new powers to enforce drone offenses under ANO 2016 by: On 30 November 2019, all sUAS drones must be registered and owners / pilots must undertake competency testing. APO 2016 was updated to include more offenses after the Gatwick 2018 incidents. The Air Navigation Order (ANO) of 2016 established a number of offenses regarding the irresponsible use of drones. (National Archives, 2019) This is an extensive order much like the FAA multiple instructions / regulations / drafts for flight certifications, suitability, guidance and penalties for illegal use. Put in place significant additional classified steps to ensure that UK airports are prepared to detect, deter, and disrupt drone incursions.(Norbiton, Oct 2019).Setting security requirements for manufacturers and end-users of counter-drone equipment to safely test and refine their equipment,.Standardized signage to clearly designate areas where drone flights are prohibited, and providing information to the public on how to report drone sightings,.Guidance for CNI operators, including airports on how to assess drone risks and vulnerabilities, and training on available counter -drone technologies.The two departments that are responsible for strategy and policy associated with the illegal use of drones are Department of Transport(DT) (responsible for the safe and lawful use of drones within UK airspace) and the Home Office (HO) which has overall responsibility for domestic counter-drone activity as part of its wider security remit. (Norbiton, Oct 2019)įollowing the Gatwick drone sightings in December 2018, the DT and the Center for Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI) put in place policies to reduce the vulnerability of sensitive sites to drone incursions: Disrupting Critical National Infrastructure (CNI).Facilitating crime, especially in the UK prisons.(Norbiton, Oct 2019) document considers highest-harm risks resulting from malicious use of drones: In the UK Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Strategy we read the following objectives: (Norbiton, Oct 2019)ġ The objective of the strategy is to reduce risk posed by the highest-harm illegal use of drones,Ģ The government’s strategy is to mitigate the malicious, criminal use of drones, including threats to the UK’s national security and critical infrastructure,ģ To develop a comprehensive understanding of the evolving risks posed by the malicious and illegal use of drones,Ĥ To take a full spectrum approach to deter, detect and disrupt the misuse of dronesĥ To build strong relationships with industry to ensure products meet the highest security standardsĦ To empower police and other operational responders through access to counter-drone capabilities and effective legislation, training and guidance. The UK Government has developed one and presented it to Parliament in October 2019. There needs to be plans /policies in place. What Happens When the Enemy Decides to Fight Back? These UAS are able to fight back via EW and have both kinetic and non-kinetic countermeasures against friendly C-UAS systems. Sample real-world advanced UAS systems deployed in the field.Learn about acoustic countermeasures and their effects on MEMS.Study four classic direct energy weapons (DEW, Laser, Microwave, Particle Beams) technologies.Chapter 10: When the Other Side Fights Back – Cyberwarfare, Directed Energy Weapons, Acoustics,Integrating C-UAS into PlanningĪll the C-UAS systems described in this chapter are known by USA and friendly forces and, in general, by other countries (China, Russia, terror states under CNKI, etc.) So, the object of this chapter is to understand the lethal use of the EMS by:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |